Mill Creek Master Plan
Main Report - Volume 1
Section 5Management Unit Descriptions and Objectives
Section 5 - Management Units Description and
Objectives
5.01.
5.02.
5.03.
5.04.
5.05.
5.06.
5.07.
5.08. |
General
Project Operations
Recreation
Mitigation
The ESA's
Multiple Resource Management--Recreation, Low Density
Multiple Resource Management--Wildlife Management General
Easement Lands |
Plates
| Plate 5-1 |
Management Unit Map Index |
| Plate 5-2 |
Mill Creek Diversion Management Unit |
| Plate 5-3 |
Mill Creek Dam Management Unit |
| Plate 5-4 |
Virgil B. Bennington Lake Management Unit |
| Plate 5-5 |
Mill Creek Office and Information Center Management Unit |
| Plate 5-6 |
Mill Creek Channel Management Unit |
| Plate 5-7 |
Rooks Park Management Unit |
| Plate 5-8 |
Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit |
| Plate 5-9 |
Bennington Lake Road Management Unit |
| Plate 5-10 |
Yellowhawk Creek Park Management Unit |
| Plate 5-11 |
Mill Creek Trail Management Unit |
| Plate 5-12 |
Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Management Unit |
| Plate 5-13 |
Mill Creek Environmentally Sensitive Area Management Unit |
| Plate 5-14 |
Yellowhawk-Garrison Environmentally Sensitive Area Management Unit |
| Plate 5-15 |
South Mill Creek Trail Management Unit |
| Plate 5-16 |
Bennington Habitat Management Unit |
| Plate 5-17 |
Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit |
| Plate 5-18 |
Rooks Park Road Easement Management Unit |
| Plate 5-19 |
Russell Creek Canal Easement Management Unit |
| Plate 5-20 |
Russell Creek Flowage Easement Management Unit |
Photos
| Photo 5-1 |
Mill Creek Diversion Management Unit. Oblique view of the area behind Diversion Dam
that needs to be dredged periodically to ensure that the facilities can divert water to
Virgil B. Bennington Lake, thereby preventing flooding within the city of Walla Walla and
its environs. |
| Photo 5-2 |
Mill Creek Dam. |
| Photo 5-3 |
Virgil B. Bennington Lake |
| Photo 5-4 |
Mill Creek Office and Information Center Management Unit. Aerial view of relocated
Project Office, information center, and maintenance area. |
| Photo 5-5 |
Mill Creek Channel Management Unit viewed from Mill Creek Trail. Footbridge connecting
Mill Creek Trail and South Mill Creek Trail is in the middleground. |
| Photo 5-6 |
Mill Creek Channel Management Unit. Oblique view of the channel, looking west. |
| Photo 5-7 |
Mill Creek Channel Management Unit. Looking downstream from the footbridge. |
| Photo 5-8 |
Rooks Park Management Unit. Oblique view of Rooks Park, looking west. |
| Photo 5-9 |
Rooks Park Management Unit. Example of proposed fishing dock along Mill Creek Channel. |
| Photo 5-10 |
Rooks Park Management Unit. The pond at Rooks Park was part of the original Mill Creek
Channel. |
| Photo 5-11 |
Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit. Proposed swim beach area at the
fishing peninsula. |
| Photo 5-12 |
Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit. The existing boat ramp only extends
to elevation 1200. |
| Photo 5-13 |
Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit. Access along the lake is rocky and
dangerous to both the elderly and persons with disabilities. |
| Photo 5-14 |
Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit. Area for the proposed group picnic
shelter. |
| Photo 5-15 |
Bennington Lake Road Management Unit. Oblique view of Bennington Lake Road and the
Mill Creek Outlet Channel. |
| Photo 5-16 |
Yellowhawk Park Management Unit. The area contains restroom and trailhead parking
adjacent to Mill Creek Channel and Yellowhawk Creek. |
| Photo 5-17 |
Yellowhawk Park Management Unit. Existing Project Office to be relocated. The existing
office is adjacent to Mill Creek Channel, and has negative visual quality. |
| Photo 5-18 |
Mill Creek Recreation Trail Management Unit. The Mill Creek Recreation Trail is the
major developed trail in the Walla Walla Valley. |
| Photo 5-19 |
Mill Creek Recreation Trail Management Unit. This bench is one of the minor facilities
along the trail. |
| Photo 5-20 |
Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat Management Unit is undeveloped, and is shown
here after the first season of conversion from cropland to native grasses. |
| Photo 5-21 |
Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat Management Unit. View of the Mill Creek
Channel from the edge of the Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve, which was just recently
mowed during its development. |
| Photo 5-22 |
Mill Creek Environmentally Sensitive Area Management Unit. View of Mill Creek
Environmentally Sensitive Rea, which contains sensitive wetlands and riparian vegetation. |
| Photo 5-23 |
Yellowhawk-Garrison Environmentally Sensitive Area Management Unit. |
| Photo 5-24 |
South Mill Creek Trail is located on the left in this photo. It runs parallel to the
Mill Creek Channel. |
| Photo 5-25 |
The primitive group camping area found off the South Mill Creek Trail. |
| Photo 5-26 |
The trail leading to the primitive camping area. |
| Photo 5-27 |
Bennington Habitat Management Unit surrounds Virgil B. Bennington Lake on three sides. |
| Photo 5-28 |
Bennington Habitat Management Unit. Extensive habitat development has been created in
this management unit by WDW and the Corps. |
| Photo 5-29 |
Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit. Wildlife plantings by the WDW along Russell
Creek Outlet Channel, as viewed from Mill Creek Dam. |
| Photo 5-30 |
Rooks Park Road Management Unit. This management unit connects Mill Creek Road and
Rooks Park. |
| Photo 5-31 |
Russell Creek Canal Management Unit. Typical view of the channel, looking down the
channel from Russell Creek Road. |
| Photo 5-32 |
Russell Creek Flowage Easement. |
Section 5 - Management Units Description
and Objectives
5.01. General
a. Description of Management Units.
The MCP has been divided into 19 individual management units. A management unit is a tract of land designated to achieve, or contribute towards the achievement of, project objective(s). An important part of each management unit is the RO. Each management unit RO communicates a site-specific application of the project-wide objectives identified in section 3. In combination, these RO's tend to wholly, or partially, satisfy regional needs, as well as the expressed desires of other agencies and the public, within the limits and capabilities of the project resource base. Each management unit is assigned a name that is related to some local physical feature.
b. Composition of Management Units.
The management units, as described in this section, contain the following components: 1) land classification; 2) acres; 3) unit description; 4) influencing and constraining factors; 5) resource
objectives; and 6) development and management concepts. The following paragraphs contain a detailed outline and explanation of the components listed under each management unit.
(1) Name of Management Unit.
Each management unit has a specific name assigned to it for ease of identification.
(2) Land Classification.
There are six land classifications: Project Operations, Recreation, Mitigation, Environmentally Sensitive Area, Multiple Resource Management (MRM), and Easement Lands. The MRM is further divided into two subclasses: Recreation, Low Density; and Wildlife Management General. These classifications are defined in section 4, and identify the primary management functions of each management unit at MCP. The management units in this section are grouped by the classifications and subclassifications.
(3) Acres.
The total number of acres contained in the management unit.
(4) Unit Description.
A description of the ecological, cultural, and aesthetic features found within the management unit.
(a) Ecological Factors.
1. Landform.
A description of the landform.
2. Elevation.
Elevation (altitude) range (also refer to volume 2, plate 3-1).
3. Percent of Slope.
The steepness of the slopes (also refer o volume 2, plate 3-2).
4. Aspect.
The direction(s) the unit faces (i.e., north, south, etc.). Also refer to volume 2, plate 3-3.
5. Soils.
A list of the types of soils contained within the management unit (also refer to volume 2, paragraph 3.02.c., Soils, and plate 3-5).
6. Land Cover/Vegetation.
A list of cover types (also see volume 2, plate 3-6) and trees and shrubs inventoried at the management unit. A list of trees, shrubs, forbs, and grasses can be found in volume 2, Supporting Data, Item 7.
7. Water Resources.
The names and types of streams or water sources in, or next to, the management unit (perennial flow 90 percent of the year, intermittent flow 50 percent of the year, and ephemeral flow less than 50 percent of the year).
8. Wildlife and Fish Resources.
A list of wildlife species that may be found at the management unit (refer to volume 2, section 3; and Supporting Data, Items 8 and 9).
(b) Cultural Factors.
1. Access.
The type of available access to the management unit (i.e., roads, trails, etc.). Also refer to volume 2, section 3, paragraph 3.03.d., Transportation.
2. Utilities.
Utilities used, or available within close proximity to the management unit.
3. Land Ownership/Management.
The Government and/or agency that owns the land, as well as the agency responsible for management of the unit.
4. Outgrants.
The grantee, contract number, purpose, and type of instrument. It also includes the real estate outgrant that allows the use of project lands by other agencies or individuals (see volume 2, section 3, plate 3-11, and table 3-24).
5. Adjacent Management Units.
A list of other management units that are contiguous to the specified management unit.
6. Adjacent Ownership/Management Outside Project.
The Government or other agency that owns, and is responsible for management of, the lands immediately adjacent to the project boundary. If the land is owned by an individual or corporation, it will be identified as private.
7. Existing Developments.
Developments and facilities found at the management unit.
8. Visitor Use.
Type of recreational pursuits available at the management unit (i.e., sightseeing, picnicking, and boating).
9. Archaeological/Historical Resources.
A list of archaeological/historical resources that once existed, or currently exist, within the management unit (also refer to the CENPW Cultural Resource Management Plan).
(c) Aesthetic Factors.
A list of visual and/or auditory and olfactory factors within, or perceived from, the management unit.
(5) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Summary of conditions that may limit or promote the implementation of proposed objectives. It also includes a discussion of potential environmental, social, and administrative tradeoffs that may occur in the future.
(6) The RO's.
(a) Objective.
Group of brief statements specifying the RO's for each management unit. Most management units have more than one objective. Primary objectives are presented in upper case letters. Other than identifying primary objectives, objectives have not been prioritized.
(b) Rationale.
A discussion of the need and intent of each specific RO.
(7) Development and Management Concepts.
The development and management concepts section contains a detailed description of the uses, developments, and management techniques that should be undertaken to implement the RO's. The concepts discussed in this section are not all-inclusive but, rather, are intended to convey an understanding of the type of development and the management strategies and techniques envisioned for implementing the objectives. The ultimate decisions regarding the method(s) of objective implementation rest with the Operational Management Plan. Plates 5-2 through 5-20 illustrate the existing and potential project development concepts. Readers should refer to these plates as they study discussions of specific management units. Plate 5-1 is a plate (map) index for all of the management units.
Plate 5-1. Management Unit Map Index
5.02. Project Operations
Five management units, totaling 107.0 acres, are classified as Project Operations:
- Mill Creek Diversion (17.5 acres)
- Mill Creek Dam (22.0 acres)
- Mill Creek Office and Information Center (1.8 acres)
- Mill Creek Channel (13.7 acres)
- Virgil B. Bennington Lake (51.9 acres)
These management units contain the facilities that allow for flood control and operation, as well as the administration of the entire project.
Mill Creek Diversion
Management Unit
Photo 5-1. Mill Creek Diversion Management Unit. Oblique view of the area behind the Diversion Dam that needs to be dredged periodically to ensure that the facilities can divert water to Virgil B. Bennington Lake, thereby preventing flooding within the city of Walla Walla and its environs.
a. Mill Creek Diversion Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Project
Operations.
- (2) Acres: 17.5.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: This
management unit is located along Mill
Creek floodplain, and in a cut through
the cliff.
- 2. Elevation: Range
1200 to 1250 (0.1 acre) and 1250 to
1200 (17.4 acres).
- 3. Aspect: Flat
(11.9 acres), north (3.2 acres),
southeast (0.3 acres), southwest (0.1
acre), west (0.4 acre), and northwest
(1.4 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0-7 (11.9 acres), 8-15
(2.4 acres), 16-25 (0.1 acre), and 25+
(3.1 acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima Silt Loam, 0 to 3 percent
(13.5 acres); and WaD--Walla Walla Silt
Loam, 8 to 30 percent (4.0 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (2.6 acres; U-S--Upland Shrub
(0.3 acre); W-OW-- Open Water (1.6
acres); W-PE--Palustrine Emergent (3.3
acres); W-PS--Palustrine Scrub Shrub
(1.2 acres); UB-P--Project Structures
(4.7 acres); R-DT--Riparian Deciduous
Trees (0.8 acre); and U-D--Upland
Disturbed (3.1 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Mill Creek.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Riparian-dependent
birds and furbearers.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Steelhead passage, resident rainbow
trout, and sculpins.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Rooks
Park Road and service roads.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Washington State Department of
Transportation, 62-13 Access Road,
Easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek ESA, Rooks
Park, Bennington Habitat, and South
Mill Creek Trail.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Diversion
facilities, diversion levee, first
debris barrier, second debris barrier,
Diversion Dam (with anadromous fish
ladder), and Intake canal hiking,
sightseeing.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Walking on levees or crossing the end
of the intake channel, when dry.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the CENPW
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
diversion levee blends with the
surrounding landscape and offers a view
of Rooks Park Management Unit and Mill
Creek ESA. Diversion Dam is small
scale, and does not impose on the
landscape.
- 2. Negative: The
height of the diversion levee blocks
views from Rooks Park.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The diversion facilities were designed to help protect
the city of Walla Walla from flood, as authorized by
public law. The area behind Diversion Dam fills with
gravels and sediments, and needs to be dredged out
periodically to ensure proper operation of flood
control facilities. This area is also considered a
wetland and, as such, requires special environmental
considerations and permits.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. ENSURE CONTINUED SAFE AND
EFFICIENT OPERATION OF DIVERSION
FACILITIES FOR FLOOD CONTROL.
- 2. Provide visitors with an
aesthetically pleasing environment.
- 3. Enhance visitor opportunities to
view and understand the project.
- 4. Provide safe and efficient
passage of adult and juvenile
anadromous fish to and from their
subbasin habitat.
- 5. During dredging operations, take
into account anadromous fishery and
wildlife habitat values and all
opportunities to enhance these
habitats, as well as the effective
utilization of dredge materials on the
project.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. This management unit is needed to
meet the project's authorized purpose
of flood control.
- 2. The unit is highly visible to the
public from Rooks Park, South Mill
Creek Trail, and Constitutional Trail.
- 3. There is currently no
interpretive information available for
this portion of the flood control
operations. Information should be made
available to the public to help them
understand the project's components.
- 4. Anadromous fishery resources are
important to the local communities and
the region. Safe and efficient passage,
allowing acceptable but very limited
stress conditions, is essential for the
viability of the fisheries.
- 5. There is a periodic need to
dredge an area behind Diversion Dam to
ensure the efficient operation of both
Diversion Dam and the intake canal. The
area that needs to be dredged has
anadromous fisheries, and is a valuable
wildlife habitat. the dredge material
can be used in the South Mill Creek
Management Unit and in old borrow sites
near the lake.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-2 for a conceptual development plan
for the Mill Creek Diversion Management Unit.
Plate 5-2. Mill Creek Diversion
Mill Creek Dam
Management Unit
Photo 5-2. Mill Creek Dam.
b. Mill Creek Dam Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Project
Operations.
- (2) Acres: 22.0.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Mill
Creek Dam, located across a small side
draw of Russell Creek.
- 2. Elevation: Range
1150 to 1270 (1.5 acres), 1200 to 1250
(10.4 acres) and 1250 to 1270 (10.1
acres).
- 3. Aspect: Flat
(1.0 acre), northeast (1.5 acres), east
(2.1 acres), south (0.2 acre), and
southwest (9.1 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0-15 percent (1.0
acre), 15 to 25 percent (2.8 acres),
and 25+ percent (17.7 acres).
- 5. Soils: None.
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
UB-P--Project Structures/Water
Development (21.4 acres), U-F--Upland
Field (0.6 acre), and U-D--Upland
Disturbed (0.034 acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
Adjacent to Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: The disturbed
habitats on this unit provide some
minimal habitat values to small mammal,
reptile, and avian species.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Reservoir road, Bennington Lake Road,
and Dam Service Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Telephone lines.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Pacific Northwest Bell underground
communication cable.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Virgil B. Bennington
Lake, Bennington Lake Recreation Area,
Bennington Lake Road, Bennington
Habitat, and Russell Creek Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: No portion of
this management unit contains a project
boundary.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Mill Creek Dam,
operators house, piezometers, and
42-inch discharge pipe.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Hiking and horseback riding across the
top of the dam, and sightseeing from
the dam.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: None.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Mill
Creek Dam is faced with brown native
basalt. The rock face blends in well
with the landscape, both in color and
texture. The height of the dam offers a
panoramic view of the lake and the
Russell Creek Valley.
- 2. Negative: A
pipe, aluminum in color, on the face of
the dam stands out and does not blend
with the dam.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The MCP was authorized primarily for flood control.
There is seepage around the right abutment, which
contributes to some seepage from the reservoir.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. ENSURE CONTINUED SAFE AND
EFFICIENT OPERATION OF MILL CREEK DAM.
- 2. Provide visitors with an
aesthetically-pleasing environment.
- 3. Enhance visitor opportunities to
view and understand the project.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. Mill Creek Dam is a primary
structure in providing flood control in
the Walla Walla Valley.
- 2. The dam can be seen from the lake
recreation area, the lake, and the
surrounding trails. Because of high
visitor recreation use and visitor
expectations, project structures should
blend into the natural landscape as
much as possible.
- 3. A high percentage of the public
is unaware that the Corps operates MCP.
They are also unaware of the functions
of Mill Creek Dam and other water
resource facilities on the project.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-3 for a conceptual development plan
for the Mill Creek Dam Management Unit.
Plate 5-3. Mill Creek Dam
Virgil B. Bennington Lake
Management
Unit
Photo 5-3. Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
c. Virgil B. Bennington Lake Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Project
Operations.
- (2) Acres: 51.9.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Lake
basin behind dam.
- 2. Elevation: Range
1177.2 to 1205 (51.9 acres). Also see
volume 2,
table
3-32, for acreage at different lake
elevations.
- 3. Aspect (of lake
bottom): Flat (31.8 acres),
north (6.8 acres), southeast (0.9
acre), southwest (0.4 acre), and west
(3.4 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0-7 percent (12.2
acres), 8 to 15 percent (5.5 acres), 16
to 25 percent (2.8 acres), and over 25
percent (3.4 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WlB--Walla Walla silt loam, lacustrine
substratum, 0 to 8 percent (38.5
acres); WlD--Walla Walla silt loam,
lacustrine substratum, 8 to 30 percent
(10.0 acres) and Mill Creek Dam (3.4
acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: Submerged
aquatic species within the inlet
channel. U-F--Upland Field (2.0 acres);
U-SP--Upland Deciduous Saplings (0.1
acre); U-DT--Upland Deciduous Trees
(0.03 acre); U-D--Upland Disturbed
(0.28 acre); R-F--Riparian field (1.3
acres); R-S--Riparian Shrub (1.7
acres); R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees
(3.7 acres); L-OW--Lacustrine Open
Water (19.8+ acres) - this varies; and
L-UB--Lacustrine Unconsolidated Bottom
(22.8 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Waterfowl, beaver,
and mink. The lake and its adjacent
vegetation is valuable to all types of
wildlife at MCP.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Rainbow trout (stocked), smallmouth
bass, and some forage fish species.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Bennington Lake Road and East Service
Road.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake
Recreation Area, Mill Creek Dam, and
Bennington Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: This
management unit does not extend to any
project boundary.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Intake tower.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Fishing, boating, and swimming.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the CENPW
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Open
52-acre lake at elevation 1205 in the
spring. Only public lake within a
28-mile radius.
- 2. Negative:
Unvegetated exposed shoreline when pool
is below elevation 1205. After inflows
are stopped in the spring, the 1205
lake level drops due to evaporation and
seepage. The lower the lake level, the
higher the negative aesthetic effects.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Because the primary purpose of Virgil B. Bennington Lake is flood control, the lake has fluctuated up to elevation 1241. The lake level is determined by seasonal runoff and irrigation water demand. Maintenance of the lake level at elevation 1205 may compete with the need for instream perennial flows into Mill Creek Channel for irrigation supply and anadromous fish passage.
Due to high flows and lack of irrigation demand requirements, the lake is near normal conservation pool elevation 1205 at the beginning of the recreation season (June 15). Starting in the late spring, usually around May, flows are lower and irrigation demands begin stopping the inflows to the lake. The lake levels then drop due to evaporation and seepage. During drought years, the lake may never reach conservation pool and, during heavy runoff years the lake level will be held below conservation pool until July to accommodate floodwaters. The evaporation and seepage problem in the reservoir limits the ability to maintain pool elevation.
Soils and silt substrates, along with the degree of water surface elevation fluctuations of the lake, make the establishment of shoreline and submergent vegetative cover difficult, without adequate substrate preparation.
The lack of suitable spawning habitat and limited rearing conditions for salmonids currently prevents the maintenance of viable populations within the lake.
The occurrence of water-borne parasites and occasional high fecal coliform concentrations hinders the establishment of a formal bathing-beach area.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. SAFELY MANAGE LAKE LEVELS TO
PROVIDE AUTHORIZED PURPOSES OF FLOOD
CONTROL AND RECREATION, AS WELL AS FISH
AND WILDLIFE BENEFITS.
- 2. Hold the water elevation of the
lake stable at 1205 feet as long as
possible.
- 3. Manage for stocked rainbow trout
and smallmouth bass fisheries by
enhancing the diversity of cover and
benthic prey organisms.
- 4. Actively manage to improve the
water quality of the lake for biotic
and recreational purposes. Water was
not diverted into the lake only for
flood control.
- 5. Manage for wildlife values.
- 6. Provide for water-oriented
recreational opportunities.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The MCP was authorized primarily
for flood control in the 1940's. In the
early 1950's, however, both Federal and
State agencies quickly realized the
opportunity to provide the public with
enhanced opportunities by filling the
lake for recreation and fishery
habitat.
- 2. The stability of Virgil B.
Bennington Lake would allow for full
utilization of recreational facilities
such as fishing, boating, and swimming.
It provides an aesthetically-pleasing,
natural lake appearance, as well as
many benefits to fish, wildlife, and
water quality. This is especially
important during the recreation season
and the smallmouth bass spawning
season.
- 3. The Walla Walla area is limited
in water-oriented recreational
opportunities close to the human
population. Virgil B. Bennington Lake
provides for one of the only popular
fishing lakes for one of the only
popular fishing lakes for many people
in the surrounding area. To maintain
gamefish populations to meet public
demand, the WDW manages the lake
primarily by stocking it with rainbow
trout. No spawning of rainbow trout
occurs within the lake or its inlet due
to inadequate availability of gravel
substrate, low dissolved oxygen, high
temperatures, and operational water
level fluctuations. Smallmouth bass
also inhabit the lake, providing
additional fishing opportunities to the
public. Bass can tolerate higher water
temperatures and lower dissolved oxygen
levels than salmonids, but spawning
requires a greater degree of water
surface elevation stability. Habitat
improvement projects would be highly
beneficial, and can be readily
identified for the implementation plan.
- 4. The water quality in Virgil B.
Bennington Lake degrades throughout the
season due to stagnation under higher
water temperatures and low pool
elevations resulting from lack of
inflow due to competition with
irrigation withdrawals. The resultant
lack of rooted vegetative production
contributes to the limited potential of
the lake. The fishery potential cannot
be realized without maintaining
sufficient water quality, such as
dissolved oxygen levels. Water seeps
from the lake at the substrate
interface level, which causes some
degree of flow-through depending on
water surface elevation level. The
stabilization of the water surface near
1205 feet would benefit this exchange
of water and retard the effects of
stratification on water temperature,
thus alleviating effects of
stagnation.
- 5. The variety of surrounding
wildlife, both resident and
migrational, are dependent on the lake
for a water supply. Hiding cover
corridors to the water line become
critical for survival from predation,
especially for the juvenile portion of
the populations. currently, when the
lake elevation drops below 1205, there
is no hiding cover next to the lake.
- 6. Virgil B. Bennington Lake is the
primary recreational opportunity on the
project. The lake is a unique
recreational resource in the Walla
Walla Valley, with close access to the
area's 50,000 residents. Fishing from
the shoreline and non-motorized boating
are the primary recreational activities
on the lake.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-4 for a conceptual development plan for the Virgil B. Bennington Lake Management Unit.
Provide for a 1205-foot elevation conservation pool for as long a period of time as possible in the spring for smallmouth bass spawning, and in the summer for recreational opportunity and water temperature moderation, and in the fall for winter fisheries.
Water rights allow the Corps to withdraw water from Mill Creek to the lake in the fall. Doing so to refill Virgil B. Bennington Lake to elevation 1205 would provide better water quality for the overwintering of fish.
The WDW considers Virgil B. Bennington Lake primarily for stocked put-and-take trout. The lake is a stratified fishery with some smallmouth bass over rainbow trout, and provides suitable spawning habitat for rainbow trout in the lake. Rainbow trout rearing and smallmouth bass spawning is limited by operational water level fluctuations and the lack of benthic prey organism production. Selected bathymetric areas of the lake can be deepened. Piles of rock and root wads should be supplemented, as well as weed mat base, in selected shoreline areas at depths below the managed water surface fluctuation elevation.
Plate 5-4. Virgil B. Bennington Lake
Mill Creek Office and Information Center
Management Unit
(Note: Currently,
the Project Office and maintenance yard is located in
Yellowhawk Creek Park.)
Photo 5-4. Mill Creek Office and Information Center Management Unit.
Aerial view of relocated Project Office, information center, and maintenance area.
d. Mill Creek Office and Information Center Management
Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Project
Operations.
- (2) Acres: 1.8.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
triangular area along Mill Creek,
between Yellowhawk Creek, Mill Creek
Return Canal, and Bennington Lake Road.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (1.8 acres).
- 3. Aspect (of lake
bottom): Flat (1.8 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: Flat (1.8 acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent
(1.8 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (1.4 acres), and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development (0.0001
acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
Yellowhawk and Mill Creeks.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Waterfowl, beaver,
and mink.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Anadromous steelhead, resident rainbow
trout, and sculpins.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Reservoir Road (county) and Bennington
Lake Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Electric and telephone.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake Road,
Mill Creek Channel, and South Mill
Creek Trail.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: No part of
this management unit is on a project
boundary.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Mill Creek
Return Canal.
- 8. Visitor Use:
None.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the CENPW
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive:
Currently undeveloped, with native
grasses and shrubs.
- 2. Negative: None.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The current office and maintenance facilities located at Yellowhawk Park do not meet current needs, regulations, codes, and guidelines. Locating these facilities in the management unit would better serve the project operation and maintenance, and better serve the public. Additionally, the lands used by these office and maintenance facilities at Yellowhawk Management Unit would better serve as a picnic area along Mill Creek. The existing buildings are an eyesore, and do not give the public a professional view of the Corps.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. PROVIDE SAFE AND EFFICIENT
MAINTENANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE
PROJECT.
- 2. Provide visitors with an
aesthetically-pleasing environment.
- 3. Enhance visitor information and
opportunities related to understanding
and use of the project.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The present office and
maintenance facilities are up to 50
years old, and do not meet current
regulations and guidelines. The current
location is more valuable for
picnicking and public use than for
maintenance. Relocating the office and
maintenance area would better serve the
project and the public, and would
better meet current standards and
regulations.
- 2. The existing office and
maintenance facilities are unattractive
with the high security fence, exposed
maintenance area, and the building
built for other uses around 50 years
ago. The public is entitled to an
aesthetically-pleasing environment.
- 3. There is no area in the existing
office set aside for visitor
information. Because MCP is a public
facility, the public has the right to
understand project operations,
resources, and potential visitor usage.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-5 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Relocate the office and maintenance area to this
management unit.
- Provide Visitor Information center.
Plate 5-5. Mill Creek Office and Information Center.
Mill Creek Channel
Management Unit
Photo 5-5. Mill Creek Channel Management Unit viewed from the Mill Creek Trail.
Footbridge connecting Mill Creek Trail and South Mill Creek Trail is in the middleground.
Photo 5-6. Mill Creek Channel Management Unit. Oblique view of the channel, looking west.

Photo 5-7. Mill Creek Channel Management Unit. Looking downstream from the footbridge.
e. Mill Creek Channel Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Project
Operations.
- (2) Acres: 13.7.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Water,
and its associated bathymetry, within
the boundaries of the channel's high
water mark for Mill Creek and the
Garrison-Yellowhawk Creek confluence
area.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (5.8 acres), 1200 to 1250 (7.8
acres), and 1250 to 1300 (0.1 acre).
- 3. Aspect (of lake
bottom): Flat (13.7 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 3 percent (13.7
acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent
(13.7 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
R-OW--Riverine Open Water (13.1 acres)
and UB-P--Project Structures/Water
Development (0.6 acre). Native, with
introduced riparian trees and shrubs.
- 7. Water Resources:
Perennial flow downstream from the dam
at Rooks Park through the diversion
works at the project office complex to
Garrison and Yellowhawk Creeks.
Intermittent flow downstream from the
diversion works of the Mill Creek
Channel to the project boundary.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Wading birds,
songbirds, migratory waterfowl,
amphibians, and mink. The riparian
habitat within and adjacent to this
management unit is valuable to all
types of wildlife existing on MCP.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Steelhead, rainbow trout, bull trout
(possible corridor), sculpins, some
forage fish species, and benthic
invertebrates.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Mill
Creek Recreational Trail, South Mill
Creek Trail (South Levee Service Road).
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Recreation
trail, Rooks Park, Mill Creek
Diversion, South Mill Creek Trail, MCP
Office and Information Center, and
Yellowhawk Recreation Area.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private,
State of Washington (Walla Walla
Community College), and Walla Walla
County (Mill Creek Flood Control Zone
District).
- 7. Existing
Developments: Channelized
stream corridor with concrete weirs,
riprap sides, First Division Works,
fish ladder, concrete stream crossing,
and large boulders placed for fish
habitat.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Fishing and wading/swimming.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the CENPW
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Water
feature, clear-flowing stream, color of
weirs and riprap are a dark hue that
blends, and adjacent cottonwood
vegetation.
- 2. Negative: Series
of concrete weirs, riprap on the side
of the channel, lack of streamside
vegetation, and relatively even width
with uniform water depths. Below
Division Dam, dry channel following the
diversion of water to
Yellowhawk-Garrison Creeks (usually
between May/June and the fall).
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Seasonal runoff, the city of Walla Walla municipal water withdrawals, and the small amount of irrigation withdrawal determines flows in Mill Creek Channel to Diversion Dam near Rooks Park. In the spring and during times of flooding, water is diverted at Diversion Dam to Bennington Lake. Flows between Diversion Dam and Division Dam at the Project Office are perennial. At Division Dam, approximately 70 cfs of water is diverted to Yellowhawk and Garrison Creeks. This means that, between early summer and fall, all of the water in Mill Creek Channel is diverted and the channel is dry below Division Dam. This results in extremely poor water quality, or no water at all.
The objective to maintain Virgil B. Bennington Lake at elevation 1205 for as long a period as possible may compete and interfere with the need for providing adequate perennial flow in Mill Creek Channel.
In the Mill Creek Channel, the demand for irrigation withdrawal, in conjunction with the construction of concrete cascading weirs and vegetative removal to maintain channel capacity and efficiency in 1986, has made the establishment of instream and near-shore vegetation difficult. The lack of vegetationwithin the channel allows no capacity for water temperature moderation through shading or for an organic foodbase that supports the benthic invertebrates that are forage for fish.
Steelhead are the dominant anadromous fish species using this portion of the project. Chinook salmon have generally been gone from Mill Creek since around the 1920's. Bull trout are resident and have a fluvial lifestyle higher up the creek system in the subbasin. Single large boulders were placed in a triangulated pattern for salmonid refugium in the mid-1980's. Suitable spawning substrate for salmonids is present within sections of the channel, although these areas are only moderately usable due to embeddedness and profuse algal growth on the cobble gravel substrate during low-flow operation. Since active management of the channel for flood dissipation and water diversion began, it has been typically viewed that the channel was used primarily as a migrational corridor for adult anadromous fish, and that the migrating fish continue upstream to spawn in the subbasin. This assumption would still require the management of the channel for adequate passage conditions in respect to water supply (flow) and quality, adequate forage, and resting areas. Adult steelhead, unlike the various salmon species, do not always die following their spawn, and may forage during their migration. Maintenance of flow within the channel for the smolt outmigration has been less of a concern because
the main Mill Creek Channel through Walla Walla is typically functional during the spring with greater flow volumes. The water quality and high temperatures below Walla Walla are the greater concern for blockage or modified anadromous passage behavior. Water quality degrades as water supply decreases during the summer, forcing steelhead to follow the stable flow conditions of Yellowhawk Creek.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. MANAGE CHANNEL TO PROVIDE
AUTHORIZED PURPOSES OF FLOOD CONTROL
AND RECREATION, AS WELL AS FISH AND
WILDLIFE BENEFITS.
- 2. PROVIDE ADEQUATE PERENNIAL FLOW
LEVELS FOR ADULT AND JUVENILE
ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE SEASONS DURING
UPSTREAM MIGRATION FROM YELLOWHAWK AND
GARRISON CREEKS INTO THE MILL CREEK
CHANNEL, AS WELL AS THE MILL CREEK
CHANNEL BELOW THE DIVERSION PRIOR TO
THE TIME WHEN LOW STREAMFLOWS ELIMINATE
WATER IN THE MILL CREEK CHANNEL BELOW
THE YELLOWHAWK-GARRISON DIVISION.
- 3. Coordinate with other Government
agencies and private organizations in
actively pursuing and coordinating the
acquisition of water rights and
streamside land parcels in critically
determined problem areas in Mill Creek
and the Walla Walla River to alleviate
the cumulative effects of elevated
temperature and poor water quality.
- 4. Provide for resting and feeding
pool areas, in conjunction with the
concrete cascades. Allow woody riparian
species (as much as possible without
interfering with flood control) to grow
to provide temperature moderation.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. All vegetation within the channel
was removed in 1986 to improve channel
efficiency. At the request of WDW,
large boulders were sparsely placed as
mitigation for the needs of all fish
lifestyles and likely provides refugium
more beneficial to predator fish. A
more diverse habitat structure,
including vegetation patches, is
warranted. Vegetation not only
provides hiding cover from predators,
but also provides for temperature
moderation, attachment substrate for
invertebrate prey species, and
sedimentation traps.
- 2. Due to constraints of irrigation
and municipal water withdrawals leading
to elevated temperatures and poor water
quality below the city of Walla Walla,
most anadromous fish utilize the more
stable perennial flows of Yellowhawk
and Garrison Creeks. This response
intensifies the importance of
maintaining adequate flows in these
creeks for anadromous fish population
viability. Adult steelhead must have at
least 1.5 to 2.0 vertical feet of water
in the channel to safely pass upstream.
- 3. The Corps cannot manage land
under other ownership, and can be
constrained with coordination demands.
The Corps does have the expertise to
restore parcels of land deemed
important to project or system
operation for the enhancement of
fishery resources. By managing critical
areas of the creek, system-wide
anadromous fish production can be
rehabilitated without relying solely on
the uncertainty of managing secondary
creek systems with less capacity for
sustaining fish populations. A local
cooperating interest in fishery
enhancement presently exists. Walla
Walla High School has an interest in a
cooperative effort with the Corps and
WDW to implement habitat improvement
and possible hatchery projects along
their portion of Yellowhawk Creek.
A local steelhead sportsman
organization currently operates an
adult trap for a small hatchery
operation on Yellowhawk Creek. The
group is allowed to supplant 25,000 fry
out of its Henry Canyon facility on
Mill Creek. Sufficient coordination
needs to occur between hatchery
interests and efforts to ensure
adeqaute escapement to subbasin
habitats for natural spawning.
- 4. The original construction of the
concrete cascading weir system resulted
in pools below the weirs of about 4 to
6 feet deep. These pools provided
resting and feeding areas for adult
anadromous salmonids on their upstream
migration by partially imitating the
natural pool/riffle/run system of the
original creek. Pools below the weirs
also provided for areas needed for
acceleration so that adult fish can
safely traverse a weir. The regulated
flows since construction of the weirs
have caused substrate material to fill
in areas behind and below the weirs,
thus reducing the diversity of fish
habitat to which anadromous fish have
adapted.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-6 for a conceptual development plan for this management unit.
Provide for a minimum instream eprennial flow resulting in 2 feet of water depth at the highest elevational point in the channel annually from 15 March through 15 September for safe and efficient passage of
juvenile and adult steelhead. This minimum flow provision needs to be maintained through the Yellowhawk and Garrison Creek diversion to provide adequate passage conditions for steelhead and resident fish in their efforts to reach subbasin spawning areas. Suitable spawning habitat for salmonids does not exist in this portion of the channel due to low-flow management, resulting in embedded substrate, elevated temperatures, low oxygen transfer in the water and through the gravels, and rofuse algal growth as a result of dissipated water velocities and high solar radiance. This accumulated algal growth becomes stagnated with more reduced flows, and the species composition dominated by filomeztom (scum-forming green algae) is not conducive to the support of a diversity of benthic invertebrates important as forage for fish. Enhancement of instream woody species capable of providing seasonal shade, and the addition of randomly distributed groups of boulders (as opposed to single angular boulders), would provide successional conditions and organic forage input for a greater diversity of benthic invertebrates.
To further destabilize the present channel conditions toward a more productive seasonally dynamic system, pools should be recreated (by excavation) below every second or third concrete cascading weir. These pools would contribute to increased diversity in habitat and species composition, and provide for salmonid feeding and rearing areas, while still maintaining the needed energy dissipating conditions for flooding flows. Consideration should be given to allowing for a periodic flooding event through the channel to scour accumulated sediments and maintain the pool's beneficial attributes.
Plate 5-6. Mill Creek Channel
5.03. Recreation
There are five management units, totaling 68.4 acres, that are classified Recreation:
- Rooks Park (18.4 acres)
- Bennginton Lake Recreation Area (14.4 acres)
- Bennington Lake Road (24.4 acres)
- Yellowhawk Park (2.6 acres)
- Mill Creek Recreation Trail (8.6 acres)
The recreation facilities at MCP help meet the regional and local demands for recreation. As shown in volume 2, recreational demands are projected to increase dramatically into the year 2000. Recreation demands at MCP will also increase. The maintenance and expansion of recreation facilities at MCP will help meet these needs.
Rooks Park
Management Unit
Photo 5-8. Rooks Park Management Unit. Oblique view of Rooks Park, looking west.
Photo 5-9. Boise River Parkway. Example of proposed fishing dock along Mill Creek Channel.
Photo 5-10. Rooks Park Management Unit.
The pond at Rooks Park was part of the original Mill Creek Channel.
a. Rooks Park Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Recreation.
- (2) Acres: 18.6.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: This
is a flat area along Mill Creek
Channel.
- 2. Elevation: 1200
to 1250 (17.7 acres) and 1250 to 1300
(0.9 acre).
- 3. Aspect (of lake
bottom): Flat, 0 to 3 percent
(18.3 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 3 percent (18.6
acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent
(18.6 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-S--Upland
Shrubs (3.2 acres); R-DT--Riparian
Deciduous Trees (5.9 acres);
W-OW--Palustrine Open Water (0.2 acre);
W-PE--Palustrine Emergent (0.6 acre);
UB-L--Irrigated Lawn (5.9 acres); and
UB-P--Project Structures/Water
Development (2.8 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Mill Creek and a pond (a remnant of the
original Mill Creek Channel).
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Bull frogs and
songbirds.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None, but the pond has the potential to
be a rearing area.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Washington State Highway 12, Mill Creek
Road, and Rooks Park Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Underground electricity and telephone.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Recreation
Trail, Mill Creek Diversion, and Mill
Creek Channel.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Both private
and Walla Walla County (Rooks Park
Road).
- 7. Existing
Developments: 35 picnic
tables, 1 flush restroom (septic and
drainage field), public telephone,
metal storage building (278 square
feet), drinking water, 54 auto parking
slots, charcoal grills, fire rings,
kiosk, and an irrigated lawn area with
shade trees.
- 8. Visitor Use:
46,500 (1992) annual visitors for
picnicking, swimming, sunbathing,
hiking, and trailhead use.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources:
- a.
Archaeological. Refer
to the Corps Cultural Resource
Management Plan.
- b.
Historical. Located within the
Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Rural
location, large lawn areas, large
old-growth cottonwoods, natural
vegetation, the nearby cliff, and Mill
Creek offer excellent scenic resources.
- 2. Negative: The
metal storage building and diversion
levee impact the area's natural beauty.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
There is only a limited area for expansion. It is the
only park outside the city limits of Walla Walla or
College Place within 28 miles. Visitation has
dramatically increased since the park was opened in the
mid-1960's.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AND ENHANCE
INTENSIVE DAY-USE RECREATION AT ROOKS
PARK, WITH THE PRIMARY EMPHASIS ON
PICNICKING AND TRAIL USE.
- 2. Protect and enhance the unit's
visual resources.
- 3. Improve the picnicking experience
by providing facilities such as a group
shelter and additional tables.
- 4. Provide and improve access for
persons with disabilities and the
elderly.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. Rooks Park is one of the best
picnicking facilities in the Walla
Walla Valley, and is located in close
proximity to the city of Walla Walla.
It is the only one within 28 miles that
has a rural setting. The public
expects, and has a right to, an
aesthetically-pleasing environment.
- 2. High visitation and public
expectations in visiting public
resource areas are the main reasons to
protect and enhance the visual
resource.
- 3. Many large groups (businesses and
families) are using Rooks Park for
picnics. Group shelters are essential
for group picnics, especially in the
spring and early summer when visitation
is at its highest.
- 4. All persons have a right to enjoy
public recreation facilities. Current
regulations require universal access
for persons with disabilities.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-7 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Monitor and maintain suitable water quality.
- Improve the aesthetics of the area by planting
additional trees and shrubs in order to provide
a unified appearance, screening, and shade.
- Improve parking.
- Improve fishing and picnicking access for both
persons with disabilities and elderly access at
the fishing dock.
- Provide interpretive information about the
project's operations, ecology, and cultural
features.
- Study the potential for providing a rearing area
for fish in the old channel (pond).
Plate 5-7. Rooks Park

Bennington Lake Recreation Area
Management
Area
Photo 5-11. Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit.
Proposed swim beach area at the fishing peninsula.

Photo 5-12. Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit.
The existing boat ramp only extends to elevation 1200.

Photo 5-13. Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit.
Access along the lake is rocky and dangerous to both the elderly and persons with disabilities.

Photo 5-14. Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit.
Area for the proposed group picnic shelter.

b. Bennington Lake Recreation Area Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Recreation.
- (2) Acres: 14.4.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform:
Moderate to steep slopes along
Bennington Lake.
- 2. Elevation: 1205
to 1250 (10.1 acres) and 1250 to 1300
(4.3 acres).
- 3. Aspect: East
(5.6 acres); northeast (2.0 acres);
south (2.0 acres); southeast (2.0
acres); southwest (1.9 acres); flat
(0.9 acre); and north (0.1 acre).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 8 to 15 percent (8.3
acres); 16 to 25 percent (1.8 acres);
and >25 percent (3.4 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8- to
30-percent slopes (6.4 acres); Mill
Creek Dam (5.4 acres); at the parking
area, Bp--Borrow Pit (1.6 acres); and
WlB--Walla Walla silt loam, lacustrine
substratum, 0 to 8 percent (1.1 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (3.8 acres), U-S--Upland Shrub
(2.5 acres); U-D--Upland Disturbed (2.7
acres); U-SP--Upland Deciduous Saplings
(1.7 acres); R-DT--Riparian Deciduous
Trees (0.0006 acre); L-UB--Lacustrine
Unconsolidated Bottom (0.4 acre);
UB-P--Project Structures/Water
Development (0.9 acre); and
UB-T--Transportation (2.4 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Adjacent to Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Mule deer,
songbirds, and California quail.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None. Refer to the Virgil B. Bennington
Lake Management Unit.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: U.S.
Highway 12, Tausick Way, Reservoir
Road, and Bennington Lake Road.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Dam,
Bennington Habitat, Bennington Lake
Road, and FWWTR Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: No part of
this management unit is on the project
boundary.
- 7. Existing
Developments: 1 restroom
(vault), boat launching ramp (to
elevation 1200), parking, gravel
parking lot, irrigated lawn, concrete
pad, and reservoir elevation gauge
(along entrance road).
- 8. Visitor Use:
Fishing, picnicking, boating, and
sightseeing.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Virgil
B. Bennington Lake; the surrounding
views of the project, foothills, and
the Blue Mountains.
- 2. Negative:
Exposed mud when the lake level is low.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Bennington Lake Recreation Area is the only recreation area adjacent to a lake within 28 miles of the city of Walla Walla. Access to the lake is difficult for elderly and impossible for persons with dissabilities, due to steep topography. Parasites, causing swimmers itch and fecal coliform concentrations, currently hinder the development of a formal swim beach area. State of Washington water quality standards do, however, hold primary contact recreation as a beneficial use of all lakes. Virgil B. Bennington Lake is classified as a lake.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AND ENHANCE
INTENSIVE DAY-USE RECREATION AT
BENNINGTON LAKE, WITH THE PRIMARY
EMPHASIS ON WATER-ORIENTED RECREATION.
- 2. Improve the water-oriented
experience with provision of facilities
such as a group shelter, safe access to
the lake, paved parking, and a new boat
ramp.
- 3. Provide access for persons with
disabilities and the elderly.
- 4. Provide visitors with an
aesthetically-pleasing environment.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. Bennington Lake is the only
public lake within 28 miles of the city
of Walla Walla. This management unit
provides the only lake-oriented
recreation for the city of Walla Walla
and its environs.
- 2. Recreation facilities have only
slightly improved since 1953, when the
lake was first filled for recreation.
Visitation, however, has increased 500
percent since 1953. For example, the
boat ramp is not useable after a 5-foot
drop in the lake and, in some drought
years, the water does not reach the
ramp.
- 3. Access is extremely difficult and
unsafe for the elderly, and impossible
for persons confined to wheelchairs.
All persons have a right to enjoy
public recreation facilities. Current
regulations require universal access
for persons with disabilities.
- 4. The public expects, and has a
right to, a pleasing aesthetic
environment. High visitation and public
expectations in visiting public
resource areas are the main reasons to
protect and enhance the visual.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-8 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Provide safe and universal access to the lake.
- Replace and extend the boat ramp to eliminate
safety hazards and property damage.
- Improved picnic facilities, with emphasis on the
elderly and persons with disabilities.
- Improved parking.
- Improved water quality.
- Provide public phone.
- Provide swim beach.
- Provide an additional comfort station.
- Provide interpretive information about the
operation of the project and its ecological
features.
Plate 5-8. Bennington Lake Recreation Area
Bennington Lake Road
Management Unit
Photo 5-15. Bennington Lake Road Management Unit.
Oblique view of Bennington Lake Road and the Mill Creek Outlet Channel.
c. Bennington Lake Road Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Recreation.
- (2) Acres: 24.4.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform:
Rolling hills between Mill Creek
floodplain and Prospect Point.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (4.7 acres); 1200 to 1250 (16.7
acres); and 1250 to 1300 (3.1 acres).
- 3. Aspect: West
(8.8 acres); flat (6.6 acres);
southwest (4.7 acres); northwest (2.5
acres); east (0.7 acre); and southeast
(0.6 acre).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (6.6
acres); 8 to 15 percent (9.5 acres); 16
to 25 percent (3.8 acres); and >25
percent (4.5 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8 to 30
percent (19.9 acres); and YmA--Yakima
silt loam, 0 to 3 percent (4.5 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
field (11.3 acres); U-S--Upland Shrubs
(1.8 acres); U-CT--Upland Coniferous
Trees (0.4 acre); U-DT--Upland
Deciduous Trees(1.1 acres);
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees (0.1
acre); UB-P--Project Structures/Water
Development (2.3 acres); and
B-T--Urban/Transportation (2.6 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Mill Creek Return Canal (intermediate).
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: California quail
and songbirds.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: U.S.
Highway 12, Tausick Way, Reservoir
Road, Bennington Lake Road, and Mill
Creek Outlet Canal Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Electric and telephone (aerial).
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Pacific Northwest Bell, 85-48,
above-ground communications cable,
easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Yellowhawk Recreation
Area, Mill Creek Office and Information
Center, Yellowhawk-Garrison ESA, Fort
Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat,
Bennington Lake Recreation Area, Mill
Creek Dam, and Russell Creek Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Walla Walla
County and private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Bennington Lake
Road, Second Division Works, Return
Canal Service Road (Constitution Path),
Mill Creek Return Channel, and
associated facilities.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Sightseeing, bicycling, vehicular
access to Bennington Lake Recreation
Area, and hiking.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
curvilinear alignment of Bennington
Lake Road provides an excellent scenic
drive to Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
- 2. Negative:
Above-ground communication cable and
telephone poles.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining
Factors.
Bennington Lake Road is necessary for access to the lake and surrounding lands. The road is used for recreation by both automobiles and bicycles. It was originally constructed for project operations only. Because it is so narrow, there is a potential for conflict between bicyclists and vehicular traffic. This conflict is also a safety hazard.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AND ENHANCE
RECREATIONAL ACCESS TO THE BENNINGTON
LAKE RECREATION AREA, AS WELL AS FLOOD
CONTROL FOR THE WALLA WALLA VALLEY.
- 2. Protect and enhance the unit's
visual resources.
- 3. Improve bicycle access to the
Bennington Lake Recreation Area
Management Unit.
- 4. Provide a safe environment.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. Bennington Lake Road provides the
only access to Virgil B. Bennington
Lake and its surrounding lands. The
return canal facilities and access road
play an integral part in providing
flood control for the Walla Walla
Valley.
- 2. The road has high recreational
use. The expectations of the public for
recreation include high aesthetic
quality.
- 3. The use of bicycles at MCP has
increased dramatically in recent years
since MCP's connection to the Mill
Creek Recreation Trail. Currently, the
road is narrow and no area is
designated specifically for bicycle
use.
- 4. The narrow road and scenic
alignment are not a safe environment
for both automobile and bicycle use.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-9 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Extend the Bennington Lake Trail from the Mill
Creek Recreation Trail to Virgil B.
Bennington Lake to eliminate conflict between
motor vehicles and bicycles.
- Improve aesthetics and safety by placing aerial
communication lines underground. Underground
lines are current Walla Walla District policy.
Plate 5-9. Bennington Lake Road
Yellowhawk Park
Management Unit
Photo 5-16. Yellowhawk Park Management Unit.
The area contains restroom and trailhead parking adjacent to Mill Creek Channel and Yellowhawk Creek.
Photo 5-17. Yellowhawk Park Management Unit. Existing Project Office to be relocated.
The existing office is adjacent to Mill Creek Channel, and has negative visual quality.
d. Yellowhawk Park Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Recreation.
- (2) Acres: 2.6.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
area along Mill Creek and Yellowhawk
Creek.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (2.6 acres).
- 3. Aspect: Flat
(2.6 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: Flat (2.6 acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0- to 3-percent
slopes (2.6 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (0.5 acre); UB-L--Irrigated Lawn
(0.9 acre); and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development (1.1
acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Adjacent to Mill Creek Channel and
Yellowhawk Creek.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: California quail
and songbirds.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Anadromous steelhead passage from
Yellowhawk Creek into Mill Creek
Channel.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: U.S.
Highway 12, Tausick Way, Reservoir
Road, and Bennington Lake Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Electric, telephone, and water.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Pacific Power and Light Company, 104-2,
electric line, easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake Road
and Mill Creek Channel.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Walla Walla
County/Mill Creek Flood Control Zone
District.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Restroom,
Project Office, garage/shop building,
equipment shed, chemical storage
buildings, metal well house, USGS
gagehouse, kiosk, parking for eight
vehicles, and irrigated lawns and
trees.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Picnicking, information, trailhead
parking, Project Office, and
maintenance facilities.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources:
- a.
Archaeological: Refer
to the Corps Cultural Resource
Management Plan.
- b.
Historical: The
Project Office and garage are
over 50 years old. They were
constructed in 1942, as a field
office and garage, by the
Corps, Bonneville District,
Oregon.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
management unit's large shade trees and
lawn provide a positive visual
environment.
- 2. Negative: The
management unit has the worst scenic
quality on MCP. The high chain-link
security fence around the office gives
the building a correctional-type
atmosphere. The office and maintenance
buildings are in need of upkeep. The
storage yard is next to the creek and
can be seen from the highly-visited
Mill Creek Recreational Trail.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Other than Rooks Park, this area provides the only picnic area along Mill Creek, and the only one along Yellowhawk Creek or the south side of Mill Creek. The office and storage facilities do not meet current codes.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AND ENHANCE
INTENSIVE DAY-USE RECREATION AT
YELLOWHAWK PARK, WITH THE PRIMARY
EMPHASIS ON PICNICKING AND
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY.
- 2. Protect and enhance the unit's
visual resources.
3. Improve the picnicking experience by
providing facilities such as additional
lawn area, picnic tables, and shade
trees.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. Yellowhawk Recreation Area is the
only area in the Walla Walla Valley
with access to Mill Creek except Rooks
Park. This site is undeveloped, and
currently provides the area for the
Project Office and maintenance
facilities and trailhead. These
facilities can be located in nearby
units better suited for these
activities.
- 2. The public expects high scenic
quality at recreation facilities. Also,
the appearance of public facilities
represents the quality of the operating
agency.
- 3. The site is extremely undeveloped
for picnicking and day use, and can
help provide day use for existing
demand and future needs.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-10 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Redesign area for safety and efficiency.
- Provide additional picnic facilities.
- Provide more parking.
- Provide interpretive information about the project
operations and ecological and cultural
features.
- Improve aesthetics by adding more trees and shrubs.
Plate 5-10. Yellowhawk Creek Park
Mill Creek Recreation Trail
Management
Unit
Photo 5-18. Mill Creek Recreation Trail Management Unit.
The Mill Creek Recreation Trail is the major developed trail in the Walla Walla Valley.
Photo 5-19. Mill Creek Recreation Trail Management Unit.
This bench is one of the minor facilities along the trail.
e. Mill Creek Recreation Trail Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Recreation.
- (2) Acres: 8.6.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
area along the north side of Mill Creek
Channel.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (4.8 acres) and 1200 to 1250
(3.8 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat, 0 to 3 percent (8.6 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 3 percent (8.6
acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent
(8.6 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-S--Upland
Shrubs (5.4 acres) and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development (3.2
acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Adjacent to Mill Creek Channel.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Deer and songbirds.
- 9. Fish Resources:
See adjacent unit, Mill Creek Channel.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Mill
Creek Recreation Trail, Rooks Park
Road, Reservoir Road, and South Mill
Creek Trail.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Channel and
Rooks Park.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: State of
Washington (Walla Walla Community
College) and private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Paved trail and
1 picnic table.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Running, bicycling, walking, fishing,
picnicking, and sightseeing.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Mill
Creek, riparian vegetation, and a view
of the cliffs.
- 2. Negative: The
unnatural appearance of Mill Creek
Channel, and views of the Mill Creek
maintenance area.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Mill Creek Trail is part of the city and county of
Walla Walla's trail system. Visitor use has increased
significantly since the trail was constructed. This
trail will be part of the proposed Walla Walla Trail.
The Mill Creek Recreation Trail provides paved access
to Mill Creek.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE, MAINTAIN,
AND ENHANCE INTENSIVE RECREATION USE.
EMPHASIS ON NON-MOTORIZED TRAIL USE.
- 2. Provide and enhance the unit's
visual resources.
- 3. Continue to work with
city/county.
- 4. Provide access for persons with
disabilities and the elderly.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The trail is an important
recreation resource in the Walla Walla
Valley and the trail system. Visitation
has continued to increase since the
trail's placement.
- 2. The public expects, and has a
right to, a pleasing aesthetic
environment. The storage site should be
relocated to the new Mill Creek Office
and Information Management Unit.
- 3. The trail is part of the city and
county trail system. It is also a
portion of the proposed Walla Walla
Trail.
- 4. Access to Mill Creek is not
possible for either persons with
disabilities or elderly people. All
persons have the right to enjoy public
recreation facilities. Current
regulations require universal access.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-11 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Develop interpretive information facilities.
- Provide accessibility to Mill Creek for persons
with disabilities and the elderly.
- Improve picnicking facilities.
Plate 5-11. Mill Creek Recreation Trail

5.04. Mitigation.
One management unit, the Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve (FWWTR) (61.8 acres), falls under the land classification of Mitigation. This management unit was purchased to help compensate for wildlife haibtat losses due to the four Snake River dams.
Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat
Management Unit
Photo 5-20. Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat Management Unit is undeveloped
and is shown here after the first season of conversion from cropland to native grasses.
Photo 5-21. Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat Management Unit.
View of the Mill Creek Channel from the edge of the Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve,
which was just recently mowed during its development.
a. Fort Walla Walla Timber Reserve Habitat Management
Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Mitigation.
- (2) Acres: 61.8.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform:
Moderate slopes with gentle swells.
- 2. Elevation: 1365
(highest point on MCP); 1200 to 1250
(2.9 acres); 1250 to 1300 (27.9 acres);
1300 to 1350 (28.4 acres); and 1350+
(2.5 acres).
- 3. Aspect: Flat
(7.4 acres); north (3.0 acres); east
(11.1 acres); southeast (12.3 acres);
south (6.7 acres); southwest (12.7
acres); west (1.9 acres); and northwest
(3.1 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (7.4
acres); 8 to 15 percent (37.9 acres);
16 to 25 percent (14.24 acres); and
>25 percent (2.3 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8 to 30
percent (61.8 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
A-C--Agricultural Cropland (60.8 acres)
recently planted with grasses; and
U-F--Upland Field (1.1 acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
None.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Whitetail deer,
mule deer, songbirds, pheasants,
waterfowl, and California quail.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Bennington Lake Road and East Service
Road.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake Road,
Bennington Lake Recreation Area,
Bennington Habitat, and South Mill
Creek Recreation Trail.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: None.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Hiking and hunting (in the future).
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources:
- a.
Archaeological. Refer
to the Corps Cultural Resource
Management Plan.
- b.
Historical. Water
reservoir for Walla Walla Air
Base in the 1940's (covered
with earth in the 1980's).
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
management unit is along the top of a
bluff that provides excellent views of
Mill Creek, the Walla Walla Valley, and
the Blue Mountains.
- 2. Negative: The
management unit is currently
undeveloped, and does not provide
adequate visual diversity.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
This management unit was purchased under the Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan to mitigate for habitat losses due to the construction of the four lower Snake River dams. The available soil depth, within the Walla Walla silt loam, is more than adequate to allow adequate plant root penetration. The management unit is shaped like an hour glass connected by a narrow corridor, which may be a hindrance to the management of the unit.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Objective. DEVELOP AND OPERATE
THE AREA IN A MANNER THAT MEETS THE MANDATED
WILDLIFE MITIGATION AND UTILIZATION GOALS OF
THE LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE
COMPENSATION PLAN.
- (b) Rationale. This property was
one of many purchased as a part of the Lower
Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation
Plan. This mandates that the land be utilized
to support the goals of the program. These
goals are to develop wildlife habitat, both to
obtain mitigation crediting for lost habitat
and to provide public hunting to offset
wildlife and hunting losses caused by the
construction of the Lower Snake River Projects.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-16 for a conceptual development plan
for this management unit.
- (a) Wildlife Habitat Development.
- 1. Four shrub-tree areas will be
developed.
- 2. Two wildlife watering sites will
be developed.
- 3. Two dry-land wildlife food plots
will be established.
- 4. Perennial grass cover will be
established on the remainder of the
site.
- (b) Project Operations. Monument
and fence boundaries.
- (c) Public Hunting Access.
- 1. Hunting will be allowed when
adequate habitat is developed.
- 2. Hunting weapons will be
restricted to archery equipment and
shotguns.
- 3. Public informational signs will
be installed to advise both hunters and
non-hunters of the seasons when the
area is accessible to hunters.
- 4. The area near the Bennington Lake
Recreation Management Unit may be
closed to hunting due to its close
proximity to the Bennington Lake
Recreation Management Unit.
Plate 5-12. FWWTR Habitat

5.05. The ESA's
Two management areas are classified as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA). These areas are important to the operation of the project, but are sensitive and are restricted to minimal development. These areas are:
- Mill Creek ESA (42.3 acres)
- Yellowhawk-Garrison Creek ESA (2.0 acres)
Mill Creek ESA
Management Unit
Photo 5-22. Mill Creek ESA Management Unit.
View of Mill Creek ESA, which contains sensitive wetlands and riparian vegetation.
a. Mill Creek ESA Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Environmentally
Sensitive Area.
- (2) Acres: 42.3.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
along Mill Creek and the wetlands
created by Diversion Dam, with steep
slopes on the bluff.
- 2. Elevation: 1250
to 1300 (38.7 acres); 1300 to 1350 (2.9
acres); and 1350 to 1400 (0.6 acre).
- 3. Orientation:
- a.
Wetlands: Flat, 0 to 3
percent (38.0 acres).
- b. Cliff:
North (3.2 acres); northeast
(0.1 acre); and west (0.9
acre).
- 4. Percent of
Slope:
- a.
Wetlands: 0 to 3
percent (38.0 acres).
- b. Cliff: 8
to 15 percent (0.5 acre); 16 to
25 (0.5 acre); and >25
percent (3.4 acres).
- 5. Soils:
- a.
Wetlands: YmA--Yakima
silt loam, 0- to 3-percent
slopes (37.6 acres).
- b. Cliff
Area: AtE2--Athena
silt loam, 30- to 45-percent
slopes (4.7 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
- a. Land
Cover:
W-OW--Palustrine Open Water
(1.4 acres); W-PE--Palustrine
Emergent (12.7 acres);
W-PS--Palustrine Scrub Shrub
(10.1 acres); W-PF--Palustrine
Forest (9.9 acres); U-F--Upland
Field (2.7 acres); and
U-S--Upland Shrub (5.5 acres).
- b.
Vegetation: Ponderosa
pine, black cottonwood, Rocky
Mountain maple, water birch,
red-osier dogwood, Douglas
hawthorn, Saskatoon service
berry, bittercherry, common
chokecherry, golden currant,
and Wood's rose.
- 7. Water Resources:
Mill Creek.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Golden and bald
eagles, mule deer, coyote, songbirds,
and chukar.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Anadromous steelhead, resident rainbow
trout, sculpin, forage fish, and
possibly bull trout.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: A
limited project road along the
Diversion Levee allows access to the
management unit.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Diversion
and Bennington Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: East end of the
first debris barrier.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Limited hiking and viewing.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive:
Wetlands, riparian vegetation along
Mill Creek, and steep slopes provide
visual diversity.
- 2. Negative: The
debris barrier is the only manmade
object in the management unit.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
- (a) Wetlands: Wetlands are
protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. Any disturbance must be approved through
a permit. These wetlands provide biodiversity
for fish and wildlife, as well as aesthetic
values.
- (b) Cliffs: Steep topography,
highly erodible soils, and no available
utilities.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. PROTECT WETLANDS AND STEEP CLIFF
AREA AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FISH AND
WILDLIFE RESOURCES.
- 2. Minimize development.
- (b) Rationale. The components of
the wetland, open water, and steep cliff
habitat, in association with the increased
complexity of vegetation, provide the greatest
diversity in fish and wildlife species of any
habitat available in over a 40-mile radius. The
management unit is extremely sensitive to
development, and is not scheduled for
development. Any developments that do occur
should be very minimal.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-13 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Provide interpretive information on the management
unit's role in the operation of the project and
the area's ecology.
- Remove the debris disposal area.
Plate 5-13. Mill Creek ESA
Yellowhawk-Garrison ESA
Management
Unit
Photo 5-23. Yellowhawk-Garrison ESA Management Unit.
b. Yellowhawk-Garrison ESA Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Environmentally
Sensitive Area
- (2) Acres: 2.0.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Stream
corridor between Yellowhawk and
Garrison Creeks.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (2.0 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (2.0 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope:Flat, 0 to 3 percent
(2.0 acres).
- 5. Soils:
YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0- to 3-percent
slopes (2.0 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
- a. Land
Cover: U-F--Upland
Field (0.02 acre) and
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees
91.98 acres).
- b.
Vegetation: Rocky
Mountain maple, water birch,
red-osier dogwood, Douglas
hawthorn, Saskatoon service
berry, bittercherry, common
chokecherry, golden currant,
and Wood's rose.
- 7. Water
Resources: Yellowhawk
and Garrison Creeks.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Pheasant,
quail, Hungarian partridge, and
songbirds.
- 9. Fish
Resources: Anadromous
steelhead, resident rainbow
trout, sculpin, and forage
fish.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
1. Access: None within
the management unit. Bennington Lake
Road is within 30 feet of the western
management unit boundary.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake Road.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Partially fenced
boundary.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Sightseeing with very limited access.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive:
Riparian vegetation and Yellowhawk
Creek provide high scenic quality.
- 2. Negative: None.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
Riparian and wetland vegetation, and highly erodible
soils.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. PROTECT AND MAINTAIN CHANNELS IN
AS NATURAL OF STATE AS POSSIBLE WITHIN
THE MANAGEMENT UNIT SO WATER FLOWS CAN
PASS FOR IRRIGATION.
- 2. Provide safe and efficient
passage for anadromous fish.
- 3. Maintain suitable riparian and
wetland vegetation along the channel.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The Corps, as a "good
neighbor policy," transfers water
to Yellowhawk and Garrison Creeks for
irrigation.
- 2. Viability of anadromous fish
stocks are important for the local
community and the region. Yellowhawk
and Garrison Creeks become critical
passage corridors for migrating
steelhead when there is not sufficient
water in Mill Creek below the Division
Point (where flows are diverted for
irrigation), and water quality
conditions on Mill Creek below the city
of Walla Walla become unacceptable for
fish health and migrational cues.
- 3. Riparian and wetland vegetation
provide erosion control and fish and
wildlife habitat, especially for
anadromous fish.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-14 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Fenced boundary.
Plate 5-14. Yellowhawk-Garrison ESA.

5.06. Multiple Resource
Management--Recreation, Low Density
One management unit is classified as Multiple Resource Management--Recreation, Low Density:
- South Mill Creek Trail (24.0 acres).
This management unit is managed for multiple uses, but especially low-density recreation. This management unit also provides wildlife habitat and access to project operations.
South Mill Creek Trail
Management Unit
Photo 5-24. South Mill Creek Trail is located on the left in this photo. It runs parallel to the Mill Creek Channel.
Photo 5-25. The primitive group camping area found off the South Mill Creek Trial.
Photo 5-26. The trail leading to the primitive camping area.

a. South Mill Creek Trail Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Multiple Resource
Management--Recreation, Low Density.
- (2) Acres: 24.0.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform:
- a. Creek
Area: Flat area
parallel to, and south of, Mill
Creek Channel between Diversion
Dam and Division Dam.
- b. Cliff
Area: Steep hillside.
- 2. Elevation: 1150
to 1200 (3.7 acres); 1200 to 1250 (10.8
acres); 1250 to 1300 (3.9 acres); 1300
to 1350 (5.1 acres); and 1350+ (0.3
acre).
- 3. Orientation:
- a. Creek
Area: Flat (14.5
acres).
- b. Cliff
Area: North (9.0
acres) and east (0.2 acre).
- 4. Percent of
Slope:
- a. Creek
Area: 0 to 7 percent
(14.5 acres).
- b. Cliff
Area: 8 to 15 percent
(0.8 acre); 16 to 25 percent
(0.2 acre); and >25 percent
(8.5 acres).
- 5. Soils:
- a. Creek
Area: YkA--Yakima
gravelly silt loam, 0- to
3-percent slopes (16.0 acres)
and YmA--Yakima silt loam, 0-
to 3-percent slopes (1.4
acres).
- b. Cliff
Area: AtE2--Athena
silt loam, 30- to 45-percent
slope, eroded (6.6 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
- a. Land
Cover: U-F--Upland
Field (7.9 acres); U-S--Upland
Shrubs (9.9 acres);
R-S--Riparian Shrub (0.4 acre);
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees
(1.1 acres); and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development
(4.6 acres).
- b.
Vegetation: Black
cottonwood, Rocky Mountain
maple, water birch, red-osier
dogwood, Douglas hawthorn,
Saskatoon service berry,
bittercherry, common
chokecherry, antelope
bitterbrush, golden currant,
and Wood's rose.
- 7. Water Resources:
Mill Creek and the irrigation channel.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Mule deer,
songbirds, chukar, and quail.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Bennington Lake Road, and the
footbridge across Mill Creek from Rooks
Park and Mill Creek Recreation Trail.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Pacific Power and Light Company, 67-17
electric line easement; and Mark
Klicker, 2-90-29 access road and
easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Channel,
Mill Creek Diversion, Bennington Lake
Road, Mill Creek Office and
Information, and FWWTR Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Gravel trail
(South Levee Service Road), primitive
horse trailer unloading area, and
primitive group camping area.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Equestrian, birdwatching, sightseeing,
hiking, and primitive group camping.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: Mill
Creek, riparian vegetation, large
cottonwood trees, and the cliffs
covered with native vegetation.
- 2. Negative: View
of adjacent land uses, and the view of
the manmade channel for Mill Creek.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The management unit provides access to the equestrian trails in the Bennington Habitat Management Unit and the Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit. The area for the group camp is the only area on MCP suitable for group camping, which can be done only by special permit. Sanitation facilities are not provided at the group camping area.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives.
- 1. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AND ENHANCE
SOUTH MILL CREEK TRAIL AS A LOW-DENSITY
RECREATION AREA, WITH THE MAIN EMPHASIS
ON THE TRAIL AND PRIMITIVE CAMPING.
- 2. Provide an aesthetically-pleasing
environment.
- 3. Manage and improve the food
source for young upland game birds.
- 4. Provide access for shoreline
fishing for everyone.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. This management unit provides
gravel trail access to the Bennington
Lake Habitat Management Unit. The
Bennington Lake Habitat Management Unit
is excellent for equestrian activities,
which are extremely popular throughout
the Walla Walla Valley. The small
group camping area is the only location
suitable for primitive camping at MCP.
- 2. The public expects, and has a
right to, an aesthetically-pleasing
environment. The adjacent land uses
have a negative visual impact near
Bennington Lake Road.
- 3. This riparian corridor provides
important wildlife habitat for local
species, including upland gamebirds.
The access to water is critical for
many species and, therefore, provides
wildlife observation and hunting on the
adjacent habitat management units.
- 4. Access to Mill Creek provides
important water-oriented recreational
opportunities for the public. Access
to the channel is difficult for all
persons, especially for the elderly and
for persons with disabilities.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-15 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Connect Mill Creek Recreation trail to Bennington
Lake Trail.
- Berm and screen the adjacent visual impacts.
- End vehicular access over First Diversion
facilities.
- Improve horse trailer parking.
- Connect South Levee Road to Bennington Lake Road.
Plate 5-15. South Mill Creek Trail
5.07. Multiple Resource
Management--Wildlife Management
General.
Two management units are classified as Multiple Resource Management--Wildlife Management General. These management units total 306.0 acres, and comprise approximately half of the MCP fee lands.
- Bennington Habitat Management Unit (208.4 acres).
- Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit (97.6 acres).
These management units are managed for multiple resources, especially wildlife habitat. They provide low density recreation, as well as areas or facilities used for flood control.
Bennington Habitat
Management Unit
Photo 5-27. Bennington Habitat Management Unit surrounds Virgil B. Bennington Lake on three sides.
Photo 5-28. Bennington Habitat Management Unit.
Extensive habitat developement has been created in this management unit by WDW and the Corps.
a. Bennington Habitat Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Multiple Resource
Management--Wildlife Management General
- (2) Acres: 208.4.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform:
Moderate slopes surrounding the north
and south of Virgil B. Bennington Lake.
- 2. Elevation: 1200
to 1250 (97.6 acres); 1250 to 1300
(106.1 acres); 1300 to 1350 (4.6
acres); and 1300+ (0.1 acre).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (68.0 acres); north (9.8 acres);
northeast (8.5 acres); east (17.4
acres); southeast (22.5 acres); south
(11.8 acres); southwest (22.6 acres);
west (30.3 acres); and northwest (23.5
acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (67.9
acres); 8 to 15 percent (83.6 acres);
16 to 25 percent (43.3 acres); 25
percent (13.7 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8 to 30
percent (136.8 acres); Bp--Borrow Pits
(2.1 acres); WaB--Walla Walla silt
loam, 0 to 8 percent (28.9 acres); Mill
Creek Dam (2.0 acres); WlB--Walla Walla
silt loam, lacustrine substratum, 0 to
8 percent (7.2 acres); WlD--Walla Walla
silt loam, lacustrine substratum, 8 to
30 percent (1.4 percent); and
AtE2--Athena silt loam, 30 to 45
percent (0.2 acre).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (139.9 acres); U-S--Upland Shrub
(15.5 acres); U-SP--Upland Deciduous
Saplings (5.1 acres); U-DT--Upland
Deciduous Trees (5.69 acres);
U-D--Upland Disturbed (12.6 acres);
R-F--Riparian Field (11.8 acres);
R-S--Riparian Shrubs (10.6 acres);
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Tress (6.4
acres); L-UB--Lacustrine Unconsolidated
Bottom (0.12 acre); and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development (0.86
acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
The intake stream to Virgil B.
Bennington Lake.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Whitetail deer,
mule deer, songbirds, pheasants, water
fowl, and California quail.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None (refer to Virgil B. Bennington
Lake Management Unit).
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Bennington Lake Road, South Mill
Creek Trail, Upper Service Road, East
Service Road, Farm Spur Number 1, and
Farm Spur Number 2.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Howard A. Hughes, 104-5: access road
easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Mill Creek Dam,
Bennington Lake Recreation Area, FWWTR
Habitat, Mill Creek Diversion, and
Russell Creek Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private (see
volume 2, section 3, plate 3-10).
- 7. Existing
Developments: Dirt access
roads, 1950's wildlife habitat
development by WDW, 1980's wildlife
development (shrub and tree plantings,
pastures, and food plots) by the Corps.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Hunting, birdwatching, equestrian,
hiking, fishing, and sightseeing.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
rural character of the entire
management unit, as well as excellent
vistas. The abundance of songbirds
provides excellent auditory resources
for the public.
- 2. Negative:
Straight-row, orchard-type tree and
shrub plantings do not fit into the
rural setting.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The management unit is necessary for temporarily
holding floodwaters to protect the city of Walla Walla
and its environs. The management unit also provides
important habitat for local wildlife populations, as
well as being an important area for recreation
activities (i.e., hunting and hiking). The major
soil in the management unit, WaD, is an excellent soil
for wildlife habitat developments. Precipitation is
marginal for non-irrigated plantings, but is adequate
for habitat development. The adjacent lake riparian
shore vegetation and tree and shrub plantings provide
excellent habitat diversity to the management unit.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Objectives.
- 1. PROTECT AND MANAGE THE UNIT'S
HABITAT FOR LOCAL WILDLIFE SPECIES.
- 2. Manage the unit for flood
control.
- 3. Manage the unit for upland
game-bird habitat.
- 4. Manage the unit for nesting
songbird habitat.
- 5. Manage the unit as a resting and
wintering habitat for migratory birds.
- 6. Manage the unit for low density
recreation, with the main emphasis on
wildlife-oriented and trail-oriented
recreation.
- 7. Manage habitat development
plantings to improve and protect the
visual quality of the unit.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The MCP lands support several
species of wildlife that provide
recreation for numerous visitors each
year. Managing for wildlife-based
habitat will help maintain populations
that will continue to provide
recreational opportunities for
visitors.
- 2. Bennington Habitat Management
Unit serves as an area where
floodwaters from Mill Creek can be
stored. Flood storage waters can cover
almost the entire management unit at
elevation 1270 (see volume 2, plate
3-15).
- 3. The MCP has provided important
wildlife habitat for several species of
upland gamebirds since the 1950's.
These species provide hunting and
wildlife observation recreation for
the public. The MCP contains the only
public lands large enough in acreage to
support these types of low density
recreation.
- 4. Over 76 species of songbirds have
been observed on MCP, and the
Bennington Habitat Management Unit
provides important songbird habitat.
The auditory and visual resources are
enhanced due to the presence of
passerines.
- 5. The area around Virgil B.
Bennington Lake provides both a resting
and wintering habitat for migratory
birds.
- 6. In addition to providing
wildlife-based recreation
opportunities, this management unit
provides other types of low density
recreation (i.e., hiking,
mountain bicycling, and horseback
riding). The ability to provide these
types of recreational activities so
close to the city of Walla Walla is an
asset to the entire Walla Walla Valley.
- 7. The older plantings (1950's) have
been planted in straight rows. During
the recreation season, the orchard-type
plantings are visibly noticeable in a
generally natural-appearing landscape.
- (6) Developement and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-16 for a conceptual development
plan for this management unit.
- Manage and improve the availability and functional
usefulness of wildlife habitat.
- Continue to provide travel corridors and cover for
escape, resting, reproduction, and thermal
juvenile rearing and feeding.
- Enhance the 1950;s WDW plantings to improve habitat
and visual quality.
- Adjust access road easement onto existing roads.
Plate 5-16. Mill Creek Bennington Habitat Management Unit
Russell Creek Habitat
Management Unit
Photo 5-29. Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit.
Wildlife plantings by the WDW along Russell Creek Outlet Channel, as viewed from Mill Creek Dam.
b. Russell Creek Habitat Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Multiple Resource
Management, Wildlife Management General.
- (2) Acres: 97.6.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: A
"V"-shaped drainage below
Mill Creek Dam and Russell Creek
floodplain.
- 2. Elevation: 1100
to 1150 (22.4 acres); 1150 to 1200
(33.5 acres); 1200 to 1250 (33.9
acres); and 1250 to 1300 (7.8 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (32.4 acres); north (0.3 acre);
east (4.0 acres); southeast (15.3
acres); south (0.9 acre); southwest
(4.6 acres); west (25.7 acres); and
northwest (14.5 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (32.4
acres); 8 to 15 percent (36.7 acres);
16 to 25 percent (25.8 acres); and
>25 percent (2.7 acres).
- 5. Soils:
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8 to 30
percent (75.1 acres); and WaB--Walla
Walla silt loam, 0 to 8 percent (22.5
acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Field (85.2 acres); U-S--Upland Shrub
(0.7 acre); U-DT--Upland Deciduous
Trees (9.3 acres); and UB-P--Project
Structures/Water Development (2.4
acres).
- 7. Water Resources:
Russell Creek Canal (emergency use
only).
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: White-tailed deer,
mule deer, songbirds, pheasants, and
California quail.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access:
Bennington Lake Road, Return Canal
Service Road, Russell Creek Canal Road,
and East Service Road.
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: U.S.
Government/Corps of Engineers.
- 4. Outgrants:
Howard A. Hughes, 104-5, access road,
easement.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Bennington Lake Road,
Mill Creek Dam, and Bennington Habitat.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private (see
volume 2, section 3, plate
3-10).
- 7. Existing
Developments:
- a. Project
Structures: Russell
Creek Canal, lower valvehouse,
upper valvehouse, and Mill
Creek Return Canal.
- b. Wildlife
Habitat: Two
gallinaceous guzzlers, tree and
shrub plantings (along Russell
Creek Canal, by WDW in the
1950's; and six tree and shrub
areas planted in the 1980's by
the Corps), pasture (7.3
acres), and food plots.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Hunting, birdwatching, hiking, and
sightseeing.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
management unit provides sharp contrast
to the surrounding agricultural fields
and Mill Creek Dam. The Blue Mountains
are visible from the southeast-facing
slopes. The management unit is
entirely visible from the top of Mill
Creek Dam.
- 2. Negative: The
straight axis of Russell Creek Outlet
Canal and the wildlife plantings that
parallel the canal in straight-row
plantings are a dominant manmade
feature in an otherwise
natural-appearing landscape.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
The outlet canals are used during flood control
operations. Russell Creek Canal is only used when the
Mill Creek Return Canal is insufficient. This
management unit provides important habitat for local
wildlife populations, as well as an important area for
recreation activities (i.e., hunting and
hiking). The major soil, WaD, is an excellent soil for
wildlife habitat development.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Objectives.
- 1. PROTECT AND MANAGE THE UNIT'S
HABITAT FOR LOCAL WILDLIFE SPECIES.
- 2. Manage the unit for flood control
facilities, as required.
- 3. Manage the unit for upland
gamebird habitat.
- 4. Manage the unit for low-density
recreation, with the main emphasis on
wildlife-oriented recreation.
- 5. Manage habitat development
plantings to improve and protect the
visual quality of the management unit.
- (b) Rationale.
- 1. The MCP lands support several
species of wildlife that provide
recreation for numerous visitors each
year. Managing for habitat will help
maintain populations that will continue
to provide wildlife-based recreational
opportunities for visitors.
- 2. Russell Creek Habitat Management
Unit contains important outlet
facilities for floodwaters held behind
Mill Creek Dam. These facilities are
important in maintaining flood control
for the city of Walla Walla and the
safety of Mill Creek Dam.
- 3. The MCP has provided important
wildlife habitat for several species of
upland gamebirds since the 1950's.
These species provide hunting and
wildlife observation recreation for
the public. The MCP contains the only
public lands large enough in acreage to
support these types of low density
recreation.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-17 for the conceptual development
plan for the Russell Creek Habitat Management
Unit.
- Manage and improve the availability and functional
usefulness of wildlife habitat.
- Continue to provide travel corridors and cover for
escape, resting, reproduction, and thermal
juvenile rearing and feeding.
- Enhance the 1950 WDW plantings to improve habitat
and visual quality.
Plate 5-17. Russell Creek Habitat
5.08. Easement Lands.
Three management units, totaling 87.3 acres, are classified as Easement Lands:
- Rooks Park Road (2.5 acres).
- Russell Creek Outlet Canal (11.5 acres).
- Russell Creek Flowage (73.3 acres).
The Corps administers certain easement son these management units that are necessary for the operation and maintenance of MCP.
Rooks Park Road
Management Unit
Photo 5-30. Rooks Park Road Management Unit. This management unit connects Mill Creek Road and Rooks Park.
a. Rooks Park Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Easement lands.
- (2) Acres: 2.5.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
area in the Mill Creek floodplain.
- 2. Elevation: 1250
to 1300 (2.5 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (2.5 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (2.5
acres).
- 5. Soils:
YKA--Yakima gravelly silt loam,0 to 3
percent (1.8 acres); and YmA--Yakima
silt loam, 0 to 3 percent (0.7 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-F--Upland
Filed (1.4 acres); U-DT--Upland
Deciduous Trees (0.2 acre); and
UB-T-Urban Transportation (0.9 acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
None
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: California quail
and pheasants.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Mill
Creek Road.
- 2. Utilities:
Electric and telephone.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: Walla
Walla County.
- 4. Outgrants: Corps
of Engineers access for the operation
and maintenance of MCP.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Rooks Park.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Entrance road
between Mill Creek Road and Rooks Park.
- 8. Visitor Use:
Access to Rooks Park and parking when
the park gate is closed during the fall
and winter months.
- a.
Archaeological/Historical
Refer to the CENPW Culture Resource
Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive:
Adjacent rural landscapes.
- 2. Negative: Edge
of the road is rough, and could be
maintained to give the public a better
entrance eperience to Rooks Park.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
None.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Objective:
- 1. (a) Objective
CONTINUE TO RETAIN ACCESS RIGHTS FOR
THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MCP.
- (b) Rationale. The Crops conveyed
this management to Walla
- Walla County, but
needed the land as access to the project for
operation and
- maintenance pupose. This
management unit also provides public access to
Rooks Park.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
- Refer to plate 5-18 for a conceptual development
plan for Rooks Park Road Management Unit.
- Explore options with Walla Walla County to improve
the appearance of the area between the road and
the adjacent properties.
Plate 5-18. Rooks Park Road Easement.
Russell Creek Canal
Management Unit
Photo 5-31. Russell Creek Canal Management Unit.
Typical view of the channel, looking down the channel from Russell Creek Road.
b. Russell Creek Canal Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Easement lands.
- (2) Acres: 11.5.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat.
- 2. Elevation: 1050
to 1100 (6.9 acres) and 1100 to 1150
(4.6 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (11.5 acres).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (11.5
acres).
- 5. Soils:
CaA--Catherine silt loam, 0- to
3-percent slopes (5.2 acres); and
OnA--Onyx silt loam, 0- to 3-percent
slopes (6.4 acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation: U-DT--Upland
Deciduous Trees (0.2 acre);
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees (0.3
acre); A-C--Agricultural Cropland (11.0
acres); and UB-T--Urban/Transportation
(0.06 acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
The canal, when floodwaters are passed
to Russell Creek.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Mule deer and
pheasants.
- 9. Fish Resources:
None.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Tausick
Way, Reservoir Road, Bennington Lake
road, Ease Service Road, Russell Creek
Road (county), and Russell Creek Canal
Road (Corps).
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: Private.
- 4. Outgrants:
Dodey, bridge reservation; Walla Walla
County, bridge reservation; and Jones,
bridge reservation.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Russell Creek Habitat
and Russell Creek Flowage.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Russell Creek
Outlet Canal (250 cfs capacity).
- 8. Visitor Use:
None.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the CENPW
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive: The
low profile of the canal is not visible
from the ground level, except at the
point where Russell Creek Road crosses
the canal.
- 2. Negative: None.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
This management unit is needed by the Corps for flood
control operations. The canal is used for emergency
water release from Virgil B. Bennington Lake when the
Mill Creek Return Canal is inoperable or at capacity.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Objectives. CONTINUE TO
MAINTAIN AND MANAGE THE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE
RELEASE OF FLOODWATERS FROM VIRGIL B.
BENNINGTON LAKE.
- (b) Rationale. The management
unit is important to maintaining flood control
for the Walla Walla Valley.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-19 for the conceptual development
plan for the Russell Creek Canal Management
Unit.
Plate 5-19. Russell Creek Canal Easement.
Russell Creek Flowage
Management Unit
Photo 5-32. Russell Creek Flowage Easement.
c. Russell Creek Flowage Management Unit.
- (1) Land Classification: Easement Lands.
- (2) Acres: 73.3.
- (3) Unit Description:
- (a) Ecological Factors.
- 1. Landform: Flat
area along Russell Creek.
- 2. Elevation: 1050
to 1100 (72.6 acres) and 1100 to 1150
(0.7 acres).
- 3. Orientation:
Flat (69.5 acres); southeast (0.7
acre); south (2.7 acres); and southwest
(0.3 acre).
- 4. Percent of
Slope: 0 to 7 percent (69.5
acres); 8 to 15 percent (3.3 acres); 16
to 25 percent (0.5 acre); and >25
percent (0.006 acre).
- 5. Soils:
CaA--Catherine silt loam, 0- to
3-percent slope (64.8 acres);
WaD--Walla Walla silt loam, 8 to 30
percent (5.0 acres); and OnA--Onyx silt
loam, 0- to 3-percent slopes (3.5
acres).
- 6. Land
Cover/Vegetation:
R-DT--Riparian Deciduous Trees (0.4
acre); L-OW--Lacustrine Open Water (0.2
acre); A-C--Agricultural Cropland (72.1
acres); and UB-T--Urban/Transportation
(0.5 acre).
- 7. Water Resources:
Russell Creek and canal. Regulated
intermittent flow from Bennington Lake,
used in emergency situations only.
- 8. Wildlife
Resources: Mule deer,
pheasants, and California quail.
- 9. Fish Resources:
Russell Creek: rainbow trout and
sculpins.
- (b) Cultural Factors.
- 1. Access: Russell
Creek Road (county).
- 2. Utilities: None.
- 3. Land
Ownership/Management: Private.
- 4. Outgrants: None.
- 5. Adjacent Management
Units: Russell Creek Canal.
- 6. Adjacent Ownership
Outside Project: Private.
- 7. Existing
Developments: Agricultural
cropland.
- 8. Visitor Use:
None.
- 9. Archaeological/Historical
Resources: Refer to the Corps
Cultural Resource Management Plan.
- (c) Aesthetic Factors.
- 1. Positive:
Undeveloped agricultural cropland and a
surrounding view of the rural area.
- 2. Negative: None.
- (4) Influencing and Constraining Factors.
This management unit was purchased by the Corps because
flooding in this area caused by floodwaters released to
Russell Creek through the Russell Creek Canal. The
Russell Creek Canal is only used in emergencies due to
the flooding it creates along the creek. The Mill
Creek Return Canal allows water to be drawn to lake
elevation 1210. Russell Creek Canal can draw the lake
down to elevation 1187.
- (5) Resource Objectives.
- (a) Resource Objectives. CONTINUE
TO RETAIN FLOWAGE EASEMENTS ON THE MANAGEMENT
UNIT.
- (b) Rationale. Flowage easements
were purchased on the management unit after the
testing of the Russell Creek Outlet Canal
flooded the area.
- (6) Development and Management Concepts.
Refer to plate 5-20 for the conceptual development plan
for the Russell Creek Flowage Management Unit.
Plate 5-20. Russell Creek Flowage Easement
Back to Sections 1 to 4 or on to the rest of Volume 1
Return to the Mill Creek Master Plan Page
Mill Creek Master Plan Coordinator